I think the problem I have with conflict and/or exchange letters is not necessarily just the emotional aspects, the obsessive part is the intellectual end. I don’t read/open those communications until I know I have braintime to spare, because I know I will invariably spend the next week or more trying to go about my daily routine and instead find my mind deflecting back into the Conflict du Jour, dragged into a running dialog in my head of a web of responses to this point and that.
And it doesn’t end, that’s the hard part. Every open moment not inhabitated by another idea gets sucked in the maelstrom, and I have to keep catching myself and kicking myself back out of the twisting, turning loop. It happens even if I try to sleep — another frustration.
So the whole thing with my in-laws is still creeping into my mind and putting fingers in the cracks. I’m leaping from one argument to the next, one idea to another, and write whole iterations of letters in my head before realizing I’ve been zoning for five minutes and need to get back to coding my software.
But it is not always a waste.
Based on past experience with myself, I promised myself not to respond for about a month, and I won’t… but at least I have an idea now how to approach it, after my mind leaping down either dangerous or unproductive pathways.
There is always so much in someone else’s comments that could be responded to, that I might feel impassioned to respond to, and yet would not contribute to the sort of direction I would like things to go even if on some level it would feel fulfilling — whether challenging inconsistencies, clarifying mistaken information, slapping back for a slap, being positive where positive strokes were given.
My question to myself: Why? Why engage at all? many people just let go and move on. Why can’t ii.
I realize in myself that I primarily want to be understood, and I did not feel like I was (and I know for sure now that I wasn’t). I already realize the futility of trying to convince someone to agree, but at least to have had a voice and been heard even if denied… maybe that’s what I really wanted, since these are people I see again from time to time, and they are intimately connected to people I *do* love.
The biggest realization I had was just how they do NOT see anything underneath. For so many years, I fought with Rose over her inability to see under the surface, and she’s far better than them. I can’t believe I was really that blind. The whole trans thing aside, they just don’t see what I see. They don’t know it’s there. They just see what is in front of them… and most of what they saw during my marriage was a withdrawn, unhelpful, unparticipating son-in-law… someone they did not understand but who certainly did not measure up to their way of doing things. I realize now they had lots of trouble with me before but it was all hidden under civility.
If they can’t see it, it doesn’t exist.
Which sucks, because with me, it’s always been about what lies beneath.
Rose loves me and still has faith in me as a person, my kids love me, because they knew what lies beneath inside of me. It just took Rose a lot of years to really see it, since it did not match her expectations. And nowadays, what lies beneath actually comes out a lot on the surface, which is why I have lots of people in my life who want me in theirs… but my in-laws would of course not have experienced that.
If I didn’t cry, I didn’t care.
If I didn’t help, I was being unhelpful.
If I didn’t express thanks appropriately, I was unthankful.
I’m left now wondering sometimes how much they were upset with me earlier but just found forebearance somehow.
So I already know how to approach it. it’s a matter of giving myself a few weeks to work out the details.
…And after that, I think I’m done.
It will be time to move on.
On the way home from electrolysis, I was mulling over it again, and finding myself frustrated. There might have been things in our relationship they did for me over the years, without me realizing; but in this situation, they’re utterly clueless and because I can “see,” because I am the better commuinicator, it’s up to me to take ownership and lead and carry communication burdens and meanwhile ignore some of the mistakes on their part… Why me, God? is what I found myself asking.
And then I started crying. Because it hurt.
I don’t WANT to do this for them.
Honestly?
I want to take care of me.
Protect myself.
Explain myself.
Make *them* understand me.
Do this to make *my* position better.
None of them are looking out for me.
Or even give a damn what my perspective is.
Why am I trying so hard to understand theirs enough to communicate?
I don’t *want* to do this for them.
But… that’s why I cried.
Because I can’t be doing this for me if it’s going to work.
Doing things for myself, my own self-interest, in a situation like this invariably ends up spoiling things.
Everything gets sidetracked.
There is no point in doing this
unless ultimately it’s for them,
to expose them to a bit of the world they’ve never allowed themselves to see.
To challenge the ideas that have been held for so long.
Not in argumentative way, but simply to have it out there and available.
I want them to have in front of them what my experience actually has been
so that later, when they get used to the idea that my children see something different in me,
and that the end of the world hasn’t come,
that they have something to fall back on.
If I don’t speak to them, who would?
Nothing ever changes unless something at least momentarily stands against it.
Disagreement is not prefererable,
but it’s the only way that ideas and beliefs are honed and challenged.
And maybe if I voice myself to them, there will be a chance that they’ll find something of value in it
later.
What lies beneath
them
is what has to lie beneath
me
motivating me to engage.
If I am just doing this to get something for me…
it’s not going to be productive.